INEC, Judiciary Destroyed 2023 Election in Nigeria; I’m Ashamed to Have PhD in Law — Sam Amadi

Sam Amadi, the Director of the Abuja School of Social and Political Thoughts and former Executive Chairman of the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC), has accused the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) and the judiciary of compromising the 2023 general election in Nigeria.

Speaking in a video seen on Friday, Amadi expressed his dismay at the political strategy in Nigeria, which he described as centered on bribing INEC, the judiciary, and security agencies to secure electoral success.

Amadi, who holds a PhD in law and has taught administrative law at the university level, criticized the judiciary’s interpretation of electoral laws.

INEC, Judiciary Destroyed 2023 Election in Nigeria; I'm Ashamed to Have PhD in Law — Sam Amadi
[Credit: Daily Post]

He argued that INEC and the courts, including the Supreme Court, failed to adhere to the clear provisions of the Electoral Act, particularly concerning the electronic transmission of results.

Amadi stated, “Let me say this, and I’m going to be very clear. In a every country, election is one of the strategies. So in US today you see the policy people thinking around, mapping constituencies.

“In Nigeria as well, election is one of the strategies. And the strategy in Nigeria is very simple: bribe INEC, bribe the judiciary, and come and dear the security and you are done.

“The people that destroyed 2023 election is INEC and judiciary. The rules were clear. The electoral act isn’t perfect but it is very clear.

READ ALSO: Report Individuals With Unexplainable, Ill-Gotten Wealth; Treat Them as Criminals — Delta CP Abaniwonda Urges Nigerians

“I’m surprised that any judge who understands administrative law, which I have taught in the university for many years, which I studied under the best in world, would argue that an internal regulation built on law and an act, a regulation directing that you will do an ‘X’ you can choose to do ‘Y’, when there’s legitimate expectation and detrimental reliance. INEC was totally wrong. And the courts – Supreme Court downwards got it wrong.

“When an agency created under the law with enabling act, and the constitution says you can make rules, those rules are law. They can unmake it through rule making process. If they don’t, they are bound to obey it.

“Results should have been transmitted electronically. I am ashamed. I have a PhD in law. I can stand anywhere in the world to dispute with the brightest. I am ashamed that the court affirmed that INEC could just walk away from the law,” he added.

Follow the Parallel Facts channel on WhatsApp: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VaCQSAoHgZWiDjR3Kn2E